-
- Buy a UK rod licence: EA Link
- 0800 807060 EA Hotline, Pollution, Poaching
- Thames Region River Levels
- Thames River Conditions
- Thames Temps and Clarity
- Thames Fishing Byelaws
- Thames Annual Tidefest
- Thames Record List
- Thames Eel Monitoring
- EA Annual Fisheries Report
- EA Flood Warnings
- Thames Sewage Discharge Notifications
- Thames Sewage Events
- Thames Tideway Tunnel
- River Thames Scheme: Reducing flood risk from Datchet to Teddington
- Martin Salter: Fighting for Fishing Blog
- Duncan Charmans World of Angling Blog
- Angling Trust
- Water and sewerage companies in England: environmental performance report 2013 – 2016
- EA Pollution incidents: 2014 evidence summary
- EA Pollution incidents: 2015 evidence summary
- River Crane and DNR Fisheries Impact assessment
- Links
Recent Tweets
Error retrieving tweetsNews Archive
British Waterways Launches New National Angling Advisory Group
Posted in News
Comments Off on British Waterways Launches New National Angling Advisory Group
London’s super sewer causes a stink
Posted in News
Tagged Fish KIll, Fishing, Pollution, Sewage, Super Sewer, TAC, Thames, Thames Water, Tideway Tunnel
Comments Off on London’s super sewer causes a stink
Angling Trust Response to Calls for Feeding Britain on Freshwater Fish
Click HERE to read the article.
For Publication
Sir,
Nick Weston in the Observer Food Monthly advocates eating wild freshwater coarse fish as a potential solution to the tragic decline of our marine fish stocks in his article “Freshwater Fish Fight”, posted on your web site Monday October 17th.
This suggestion is not only ludicrous, but following it would also, generally, be illegal. Buried in the article, the author does point out that the Environment Agency has recently introduced bylaws to limit strictly the number and type of fish that can be taken from freshwaters for the table because of pressure on stocks. Readers should beware that they must comply with these rules, buy a rod licence, and have the permission of the owner of the fishing rights if they want to go fishing in freshwater. In places fish theft is big business and the Angling Trust helps fund a Crimestoppers helpline on which anyone can report fish theft and illegal fish movements: 0800 555 111.
Freshwater fish stocks are under threat from: pollution from industry, sewage and agriculture; over-abstraction; barriers to fish migration; a rash of new fish-mincing hydropower turbines; predation from cormorants driven inland due to declining fish stocks at sea; habitat destruction from flood defence works; invasive non-native species like American crayfish and a host of other impacts. The last thing wild freshwater fish need at this time is to become a fashionable new source of food for the 60 million people crammed onto this little island.
We have no problem with sustainably-farmed freshwater fish being used for food; carp can be sustainably produced from ponds enriched with farm waste. By providing these farmed fish we could also meet the needs of Eastern European communities who view carp as a delicacy – so much so that it is served instead of turkey at Christmas. Not all farmed fish is sustainable of course; farmed salmon in particular is fed on huge quantities of wild fish and causes terrible pollution of Scottish lochs from faeces, uneaten food and clouds of parasitic sea lice which decimate wild fish stocks.
Wild freshwater fish provide a resource for the delight of millions of recreational anglers, generating billions for the economy, providing a healthy and educational activity for young people and a small army of anglers who help to maintain and improve rivers, lakes and canals. All that would be lost if we start a fashion for serving them with chips.
Yours faithfully,
Mark Lloyd
Chief Executive
Posted in News
Comments Off on Angling Trust Response to Calls for Feeding Britain on Freshwater Fish
The Angling Trust – sends out a call for Volunteers
Fight for the future of fishing
The Angling Trust is looking for volunteers who care about fishing and can dedicate their time and expertise in the following areas.
Social Networking
Can you use your personal or professional experience using social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter to help us: attract new members, publicise our fight for the future of fishing, engage with younger anglers and provide daily, up to the minute information on what the Angling Trust has been doing?
If the answer to any of these is yes we would very much like to hear from you by reply.
Click here to view our Facebook Page.
PR/Marketing/Communications
If you have experience in any of the following areas we could make use of your hands-on help or advice: public relations and press release writing, website content and content management systems, copywriting, WordPress and other blogging tools.
Assisting the Angling Trust with these parts of our Media and Communications Strategy might be useful to a company or individual seeking to develop their experience or client portfolio.
Events
Enthusiastic volunteers are needed planning and setting up our presence at big annual events such as the CLA Game Fair and the Go Fishing Show. You will work as part of our Events Team helping to set up the stand and recruiting new members. While previous experience working at or attending events will be useful it is not essential and all training will be provided, plus a free entry ticket to the events.
Forums
Volunteers are needed to scan the various online angling forums in order to flag up references to the Angling Trust which we need to respond to and also identify areas where we need to increase our profile. If you have previous experience using or moderating online forums we would love to hear from you.
This is a unique opportunity to work for a professional organisation representing anglers. If you or somebody you know can help us achieve our objectives by volunteering, please let us know by replying to this message at will.smith@anglingtrust.net
Posted in News
Comments Off on The Angling Trust – sends out a call for Volunteers
The Thames Anglers Conservancy response to the Tideway Tunnel Consultation
Thames Water Utilities Limited
Clearwater Court
Vastern Road
Reading
Berkshire
RG1 8DB
Dear Sirs
As the Angling Trust Consultative for the River Thames between Staines and the Dartford Crossing (including all of the London boroughs), the Thames Anglers’ Conservancy (TAC) welcome the consultation document concerning the Tideway Tunnel.
As a concerned stakeholder in all initiatives regarding the River Thames we would like to present our view point on behalf of the TAC and its membership in its entirety. This should be viewed as a separate document to our affiliate organisations, such as Angling Trust etc.
1. There is a need to significantly reduce the amount of untreated sewage entering the River Thames in London.
Please give us your views about this.The Thames Anglers’ Conservancy (TAC) would whole heartedly agree that there should be a significant reduction in the amount of untreated sewage entering the River Thames in London. The temporary consents that were given by the then Conservative Govt. – prior to privatisation in 1989 – have turned into anything but ‘temporary consents’ and the continued legality of such discharges has been/and is a blight to the City of London, subsequent Govts. but ultimately Thames Water Utilities Limited, let alone the aquaculture of the river itself. This can no longer continue, and the proposed Thames Tunnel project is an absolute necessity, if 20 years overdue in its consultation stages.
As a company it should be incumbent upon Thames Water to comply with the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive and its obligation the Water Framework Directive.
2. Taking into account all the possible solutions, please tell us whether you agree that a tunnel is the right way to meet the need, and why.
Simply put, the TAC fully concur with the conclusions of the Independent Thames Tideway Strategic Study undertaken in 2001 (completed in 2005), that the most practical and financially viable solution for London would be to intercept the Combined Sewage Overflows (CSOs) with a new tunnel system as currently proposed.
The alternative solutions would not meet the logistical, environmental and financial criteria within a City such as London and are therefore easily ruled out (as highlighted through Thames Water literature).
The Sustainable Urban Drainage System (SUDS): Logistically impossible and financially prohibitive.
Separation of the sewerage system: Once again, financially onerous and infeasible construction wise.
Bubblers and Skimmers: Would achieve little environmentally and couldn’t ever be considered as a solution.
3. If you prefer another way of meeting the need, please tell us which one, and why.
Not Applicable
4. Please select which route you prefer for the tunnel. (Note that any final decision on the tunnel route will involve engineering, planning, cost, public amenity and environmental considerations.)
Abbey Mills (our preferred route)
River Thames
Rotherhithe
None of the above
5. Please explain why have you chosen your answer to question 4.
The TAC would fully endorse the River Thames route, as it is this route will capture the greatest amount of raw untreated sewage from the CSOs. The cost of the River Thames route, whilst being more expensive than the other two proposed options, is the only route that should be seriously considered.
The River Thames route offers the greatest environmental protection for the rivers future, this regarding the three proposed routes, and is considerably better equipped to fulfil the absolute minimum requirements to enhance the aquatic ecology throughout the tideway during the first half of the 21st Century, as well as going someway to preventing possible health issues to the general populace in the immediate future (climate change considered).
6. Please give us any other comments you have about the project (see part 2 to comment on specific sites).
6. Please give us any other comments you have about the project (see part 2 to comment on specific sites).
Prior to 2007 the project cost was estimated to be approximately £1.5bn, and in a little over 3 years, we have seen the projected cost rise to over £3.5bn. It has been publicly stated that the cost to Thames Water’s 8mn plus customers will be an additional £65 per annum to pay for the sewer upgrades and a quick calculation would suggest that it will be Thames Water customers that will pay for every last rivet and bolt that makes up the tunnel’s construction? It appears that the current financing regime will burden Thames Water’s customers, as opposed to balancing the cost between the company and its customers, so detailed assurances will be pre-requisite to meet public demand.
Thames Water Utilities Limited have earned considerable profits in recent years and this would be in part due to being able to build the business with the continual status quo concerning over 20 years of ‘temporary consents’ that were issued to attract private ownership – as opposed to the utility continuing to be state owned – and it should be incumbent upon Thames Water Utilities Limited to ensure the following;
1. That all due care and consideration is given to the aquatic environment during the design and build stages. This would include a greater willingness to implement the River Thames route.
2. That Thames Water’s most vulnerable customers are protected from inflated charges and to ensure that ‘water poverty’ does not become a reality.
3. That all affected London boroughs are given full support during design and build.
4. That Thames Water seriously consider the current financing regime and fully adopt a fair and balanced costing that doesn’t see its customer’s bear the lion’s share of the expense.
5. That Thames Water guarantees that, once the project is completed, that their customer’s annual water bill will then be reduced accordingly.
The Thames Anglers’ Conservancy fully supports the need for the Thames Tideway Tunnel project to be implemented, however, the need for Thames Water to maintain the regions utility with all aspects of the environment at the very top of the list, must supersede its business concern for maximum profitability, often at the expense of its customers and the environment.
2. That Thames Water’s most vulnerable customers are protected from inflated charges and to ensure that ‘water poverty’ does not become a reality.
3. That all affected London boroughs are given full support during design and build.
4. That Thames Water seriously consider the current financing regime and fully adopt a fair and balanced costing that doesn’t see its customer’s bear the lion’s share of the expense.
5. That Thames Water guarantees that, once the project is completed, that their customer’s annual water bill will then be reduced accordingly.
Posted in News
Comments Off on The Thames Anglers Conservancy response to the Tideway Tunnel Consultation
Fisheries team shares their knowledge of Thames fish
The Thames Anglers’ Conservancy (TAC) has developed a strong working relationship with the Environment Agency’s fisheries team. As anglers, it is fascinating to listen to them, with their knowledge gained from electro-fishing, netting surveys and working daily on the river.
The TAC spoke to Tanya Houston, a fisheries team member based on the Thames:
Tanya, anglers are catching big carp along the Thames but we don’t hear many reports of junior carp being seen – 1 lb and under. Have any appeared in electro-fishing or netting surveys? If so, in what numbers and what sizes?
We don’t find young carp in our surveys. There are backwaters where carp may spawn but the juveniles could also be using these areas instead of the main river. We believe many of the larger carp in the Thames escaped from flooded gravel pits further upstream. Sounds like a good idea for a match to me!
Is the Thames or any of its tributaries stocked with carp by the EA?
No, we don’t stock carp into the Thames or its tributaries.
I understand the Thames starts getting brackish around Battersea. How far downstream do you know carp are confirmed to appear?
We have seen large carp quite far down the estuary, but this is normally due to being washed down. There have been occasional angler reports of carp captures from around Charlton. Commonly, we can catch them in surveys around Strand on the Green, downstream of Kew Bridge.
How far down the river coarse fish appear can depend on rainfall and, therefore, freshwater levels in the estuary but what coarse fish (not including eels) do you find surviving furthest downstream and how far downstream are they?
The eel fishermen fishing the lower estuary often pick up small pike and other species after rain storms or around creeks, but our main survey data suggests that we find bream, dace and roach as far down as Greenwich.
What is the current stocking policy for coarse fish in the Thames and its tributaries?
Generally we only carry out stocking of coarse fish in three circumstances: – 1. Following a pollution incident. 2. Where a new fishery has been created 3. Upstream of impassable obstructions.
The Thames tributaries in South London, however, are stocked annually to help them recover from past pollution events.
** The TAC helped the fisheries team stock hundreds of juvenile chub, roach and dace into the Beverley Brook and the Hogsmill tributaries. They were purposely stocked in November when the water is cold and oxygenated. The fish are bred at the EA’s fish farm in strong flow and cold water, to prepare them specifically for the conditions of these rivers. We’ve seen fish stocked from previous years now at healthy weights and can confirm that stocks are thriving and the restocking exercises are a success. **
Tanya, is there a water quality target for the Thames? If so, who is that target set by and how is the Thames doing against that target?
The water quality targets are set by European Directives such as the Urban Waste Water Treatment Directive and Water Framework Directive. These are achieved by regulation of industry, misconnections and controlling pollution. The best example of this is the work that Thames Water are doing to improve their three works on the Thames Tideway and the installation of an intercepting tunnel (currently under consultation).
Are there any stretches of the Thames that have a particularly low water quality reading and if so, why do you think this is?
Again the Thames Estuary can suffer from poor water quality in the summer. Combined Sewer Outfalls (CSOs) and Mogden storm discharges cause sudden and dramatic reductions in dissolved oxygen in the Richmond to Chelsea stretches, which can kill or affect fish health following rainfall. This is the most significant water quality issue in the estuary. Increasing the treatment capacity of Mogden and the Thames Tunnel will largely fix this problem.
Salmon are oft quoted as an indicator of water quality. What time of year do the salmon run up the Thames?
They are in the estuary between June and October. They will be in freshwater until they spawn between October and January in the upper reaches of the Thames.
What is the current thinking about stocking salmon in the Thames and its tributaries?
We no longer stock salmon in the Thames, but we continue to improve fish passage and influence water quality, enabling wild salmon entering the tideway to move upstream. Salmon returns have been poor in recent years but we are seeing a big increase in sea trout numbers in the Thames.
Is there a current stocking policy for trout?
We don’t stock trout in the Thames or any of its tributaries. But we do a lot to improve habitat, fish passage and water quality to enable wild brown trout to spawn naturally. The Wandle is an excellent example. We have good stocks of wild trout in rivers such as the Wey, Kennet, Tillingbourne, Chess, Upper Colne, Windrush and Cotswold streams and Lea tributaries.
There was a press release this year from the EA stating we’ve had record sea trout numbers in the Thames. What was this based on?
The records are collected by fish traps on some of the fish pass structures on the Thames initially put there to monitor returning salmon under the Salmon Scheme, they have been immensely useful in picking up other migrating salmonids. I believe we had over one hundred come through this year.
What time of year do the sea trout run up the Thames?
They will be in the estuary earlier in the year than salmon and spawn around October to December.
The TAC understands sea trout were spotted around the Hogsmill confluence with the Thames at Kingston and so work has been done to improve sea trout passage upstream. The EA appointed Land & Water, the engineering contractors, to notch out a channel in a Hogsmill weir to encourage them upstream to spawning grounds. This will, of course, also help other species.
‘Notching out’ a channel in a Hogsmill weir at Kingston to aid fish passage upstream
Tanya, anglers have heard of new eel byelaws. Please could you clarify the current law on fishing for eels on the Thames? When/where is it allowed and are anglers allowed to take any for the table or bait?
The new restrictions on fish taken by rod and line states that fishermen can no longer keep eels for any reason. It also sets out size and number of fish taken of other species under one set of byelaws.
The protection for eels has come in through different routes. The driving legislation has come in the form of a Statutory Instrument under the European Eel Byelaws which states there must be improvements in habitat and passage as well as a reduction of exploitation. Restrictions are also being placed on the commercial eel and elver fisheries and should be confirmed soon.
The Environment Agency has also written eel management plans for river basin districts across England and Wales to assess the current stock on the data available, and recommend further surveys and priority sites for works.
Are eel numbers still going down in the Thames?
European wide recruitment of elvers has been falling. This has not been obvious in the Thames fishermen’s catches, but monitoring of the fish populations has noted a reduction in larger eels in the upper freshwater Thames and tributaries.
I am not aware of any increases in populations elsewhere, but there is also a massive lack of data on eels as they were not always measured during routine surveys across the country (luckily they were counted in Thames) and they are also good at avoiding the electric fishing gear.
In the Thames, the fisheries teams are working hard to improve eel passage and habitat in schemes run by our colleagues in flood defense, planning applications and by our own small projects. For example in Kingston on the Hogsmill we have placed an eel pass on the side of a gauging weir that cannot be removed.
Hogsmill eel pass in Kingston. Elvers use the bristles to gain grip as they make their way up the eel pass, safely bypassing the weir
Other than the well publicised eel problems, are there any other species in the Thames that is in specific difficulty?
As a recovering system we are still not entirely sure what should be at which level. We are certain that fish like dace and flounder are using the Thames for a lot or all of their lifecycle but fish like salmon and lamprey are still struggling to complete their lifecycles due to water quality and migration barriers.
Are there any species in the Thames that your surveys show are in particular increasing abundance?
We have observed large number of smelt in our surveys this year, and that has been echoed by other monitoring projects in the estuary. Our surveys cannot identify a change in ‘abundance’ as they are simply a snapshot of the estuary, but it is encouraging to see a rise in smelt due to their sensitivity to water quality.
Smelt were in abundance this year in the Thames in freshwater up to Richmond. Each one netted was measured, recorded then returned
Tanya, thank you for involving the TAC in Thames events. You’ve invited us to fish surveys on the Thames and restockings on the Beverley Brook and Hogsmill tributaries. You also presented on some of the work your team does at our TAC meeting. Is there anything as a club we can do to help the Thames fisheries team?
It is useful to hear what anglers perceive as the most important thing to them for us to do which the TAC have been giving us a boost on since it was conceived last year. The feedback we get from TAC is invaluable to us. We’re hoping we can work together more in the future.
Also, anglers promptly reporting illegal fishing or pollution incidents on our emergency number 0800 80 70 60 will help us deal with incidents more effectively.
Thanks for sharing your knowledge with us Tanya. We’ll be sure to give you feedback from our members.
Steve Holmes – Thames Anglers' Conservancy
Please also see https://www.rivertac.org/site/?p=1238
Posted in News
Tagged Environment Agency, TAC
Comments Off on Fisheries team shares their knowledge of Thames fish
Behind the scenes with the Thames fisheries team
Earlier this year, the Thames Anglers’ Conservancy (TAC) attended an EA fish survey on the Thames.
In conversation with a fisheries officer, a fellow angler, we learned how he’d developed one of the tributaries he looks after. He had worked for years to improve the river. He had installed eel passes, enhanced fish habitat, conducted fish surveys and stocked this particular Thames tributary every year with hundreds of dace, roach and chub.
Then one day his phone went. The person on the other end told him of a pollution spill into his river. When he heard about the subsequent fish deaths, habitat destruction and years of work ruined, he actually wept. It was evident the passion he has for his job, the Thames and its tributaries.
These are the sort of people us anglers want working on the rivers, so the TAC asked to go behind the scenes to find out more about them.
The TAC spoke to Tanya Houston, one of the Thames fisheries officers.
Tanya, what are your responsibilities?
The fisheries team that I work in is responsible for maintaining and improving fisheries in South London and the Tidal Thames. This includes working on habitat enhancements, improving access for anglers, dealing with enforcement and fish passage issues.
How many people in a regional fisheries team?
The South East Area of the Thames Region covers from Reading to Southend. The two teams have thirteen members of staff, three of which are the Areas enforcement officers and two Technical Specialists.
What area does your team cover?
The team based at Frimley covers the freshwater Thames (to Teddington) and all southern tributaries from the Loddon to the Mole.
The South London Team covers from the Hogsmill to the Ravensbourne southern tributaries, the Marsh Dykes and the tidal Thames out to Southend.
What qualifications or expertise is a fisheries officer required to have?
This is difficult to answer; using my team we have a range of qualifications from a Masters in Aquatic Management, Diplomas in Fisheries Management, Degrees in Agriculture and relevant work experience. Enforcement officers will often have previous experience in enforcement.
Please could you give examples of typical fish related work you do?
A good example of the work that we do would be Clapham Common Restoration. A significant fish kill in 2007 due to blue-green algae highlighted the need for work to happen quickly. We put some money towards a feasibility study in partnership with the London Borough of Lambeth and the Clapham Angling Preservation Society.
Due to the work and liaison we had with the London Borough, they came back to us the next year to put the preferred option into practice, again a contribution from us. The project was managed by the borough and involved rescues of many fish including dozens of carp, profiling of the bed, fishing platform installations and margin planting.
Clapham Common – before and after
At the time of writing, the project is in its final stages of phase 2. In December, 800 juvenile tench, roach and crucians were stocked into the pond from our Calverton fish farm and the remaining carp are due to come back when we can be sure the icy period is over.
What type of work do you do on the main Thames river?
On the Thames itself, one of our jobs is to survey fish populations twice yearly at several points, including Richmond, Kew, Battersea, Greenwich and Thurrock by employing Seine and trawl nets. We measure and record every fish netted, so we can take a snapshot of fish stocks, which helps assess the health of the river.
A dirty, cold and wet job but every fish is measured and recorded
And what type of work do you do on the tributaries?
A good example of work on Thames tributaries is our improvements to fish passage and migration. Our survey work on these rivers has shown that obstructions to fish migration – all species – can have a big impact on fish populations. We’re currently involved in some great projects to provide improved passage for eels on many of our own weirs. We are also using funds we secured from DEFRA to build fish passes on the Wandle and the Loddon.
A weir ‘notched out’ to aid fish passage on the Wandle at Butterhill Mill. The Wandle has been well known over the years as a trout river, so it is essential man-made structures such as weirs don’t restrict trout passage upstream
Are you able to give examples of any stockings you have done on the Thames or its tributaries over the last year or two?
We stock South London’s rivers every year as they are still recovering systems. The idea is that eventually with habitat improvements we should be able to reduce this in the future and have a self sustainable population. The Ravensbourne, Pool, Hogsmill, Beverley Brook and Wandle all get several hundred to a thousand fish from our Environment Agency fish farm in Calverton annually.
As examples that the TAC witnessed this year, the Hogsmill this year received 200 juvenile chub and 500 roach and the Beverley Brook 400 chub and 250 dace.
We are also always on the look out for any still waters that could accommodate crucian carp without risk of cross breeding, or still waters with restoration projects that need a helping hand.
That is great work you do. What are the things that give you most satisfaction in your job?
Angling participation days are always very rewarding, seeing fresh new anglers coming to have a go. It has got to the point in South London that we have regulars that return every year!!!
Also completing restoration or access projects, the most satisfying are those where clubs find themselves leading projects forward when they first thought they couldn’t do it.
(From spending time with them out in the field, the TAC learned the fisheries team also gets much satisfaction from seeing the juvenile fish they’ve stocked with their own hands grow to a size where they can spawn and perpetuate stocks naturally).
So what are the biggest frustrations in your job?
Probably that we have so much to achieve in so little time! We make good progress but there is still so much that still needs to be done.
It is also frustrating that the anglers don’t always see the work we do as a positive contribution from their rod licence and complain that we aren’t out on the river bank enough.
** The TAC, in line with many other Thames anglers, would like to see more enforcement officers employed to check licences. Although they can call in backup from officers in Essex and Kent (Anglian and Southern regions), there are 7 full time fisheries enforcement officers covering north and south banks of the Thames Region.
However, with limited resource, the fisheries team has had success in stopping illegal netting and long-lining operations. Although they do check licences aswell, on balance, we think their time is well spent preventing poaching with nets and long-lines, as the potential for fish loss is far greater.
The team on the tidal Thames has a specialised enforcement workload regulating commercial nets purely within the river itself (there will be other officers carrying out freshwater duties landside down to Southend). The team also collaborates with the Port of London Authority, the Met Marine Police and the Sea Fisheries Authority to carry out joint enforcement work **
Tanya, is there an aspect of the job your team are particularly successful in?
This team has a particular strength in influencing planning applications and developers on access and fish passage issues. We have found that in such an urban environment it is often the most constructive way to improve areas – second only to partnerships with local landowners like the London Boroughs.
With these partnerships we are able to get massive projects done by only contributing only a fraction of the budget from rod licences. For example, the Clapham Common project we spoke about earlier was funded with £55,000 from Lambeth Council, £26,000 from us through rod licences, and £20,000 from a planning agreement from the Clapham Common South Tesco development.
You’re obviously improving fish habitat and increasing fish stocks. What can we do to help you?
We have got a good relationship with the TAC and we see it as a very valuable way to show anglers what we do with the rod licence, other than to check the fishermen have them. This I think is very important as although we do promote this work in the press it seems to pass by many anglers.
Having club members aware of our actions means that they will see what it is they are contributing towards, and hopefully feel we are doing a good job.
Thanks Tanya. We hope from this interview Thames anglers will feel the river is in good hands. We also now have a better idea of the range of work you do and why you can’t always be on the bank checking licences.
Now, if we may, we’d like to tap some of your knowledge about Thames fish!
See 'Fisheries team shares their knowledge of Thames fish'
Steve Holmes – Thames Anglers' Conservancy
Posted in News
Tagged Environment Agency, TAC
Comments Off on Behind the scenes with the Thames fisheries team
Angling Trust Joins Fish Fight Campaign But Warns There Is So Much More Wrong With The Common Fisheries
Over £600 million is spent annually by recreational sea anglers in England and Wales supporting an industry of over 19,000 jobs. The limited number of fish species upon which this expenditure depends accounts for only £30.3 million to commercial fishing.
Sea anglers are direct stakeholders in fish resources and The Angling Trust has joined the Fish Fight campaign to give recreational sea anglers a voice in an issue that concerns them and the future of their sport. We hope to open up the debate surrounding our depleted public fishery resources.
There are at least four reasons why commercial fishermen discard fish:
-
Fish are too small to be legally landed.
-
Fish for which there is no market.
-
Fish of a size and type for which there is a market but a vessel has no quota.
-
Fish for which a vessel has quota but chooses to discard small or low value (albeit legal) fish in favour of utilising its quota allowance to land larger fish which are worth more money. A practice referred to as ‘high-grading’.
Each of these categories of discards have their own complexities but are only symptoms of decades of systemic failure of European Governments to take their responsibilities for looking after our public fishery resources seriously.
For decades, the Common Fisheries Policy and the UK Government have functioned to protect the short term well-being of those who catch fish commercially rather than the well-being of the fishery resources themselves.
The real irony is that this ‘industry centric’ approach has actually been devastating to the very sector it has sought to protect because it is fundamentally flawed.It fails to recognise that the single most important ingredient in the debate is quite simply – FISH!
For many species, the EU minimum landing sizes are set below levels that allow fish to reproduce. Minimum mesh sizes are far too small. Not only do we not have closed seasons for shoals of spawning fish stocks – when they are most vulnerable – but this is often when many stocks are targeted most by commercial fishing vessels. For decades, politicians seeking short term popularity have disregarded the science. Close to shore nursery areas and estuaries are still subjected to trawling, one of the most indiscriminate methods of fishing. Gill netting and tangle netting have no linear restrictions so some inshore vessels are now working up to 40 miles of net.
The 2012 Common Fisheries Policy reform desperately requires a 180 degree turnaround that places FISH FIRST. Such a change in cultural mindset would be the best news over the long term for all who rely on our marine fish resources
Click here to go to the Fish Fight website at www.fishfight.net
Posted in News
Comments Off on Angling Trust Joins Fish Fight Campaign But Warns There Is So Much More Wrong With The Common Fisheries
Angling Trust issues ice advice for clubs and Fisheries
With temperatures set to plummet once again this winter, the Angling Trust, angling’s representative body, has issued advice to managers of still water fisheries about how to protect their fish from the weather conditions.
Frozen lakes can prevent fish feeding and make them more susceptible to parasites, and can lead to oxygen dissolved in the water being replaced by harmful by-products of decomposing food and organic matter. Shallow lakes (less than 1.5 metres deep) are particularly at risk.
Experts at the Angling Trust recommend using sub-surface air diffusers to maintain oxygen levels and to keep water moving as a preventative measure. In emergencies, fishery managers should consider dropping water levels by a few inches and employing a specialist to inject hydrogen peroxide into the water. The Trust advises against trying to break the ice because it can cause lethal shock waves and would be unlikely to help the fish.
The Trust also offers guidance on the steps that fishery managers should take in future to prepare for harsh winters.
Angling Trust Chairman Mike Heylin, said: “still water fisheries require careful management, based on sound science and a detailed knowledge of specialist techniques to maintain high standards of fish welfare at all times. There are far too many examples of lakes being managed by people with little or no experience of fisheries management.”
The 1,400 angling clubs and fisheries who are members of the Angling Trust are eligible for a 10% discount on aerators at www.aquacultureequipment.co.uk. They can call Mark Stockton on 07715 007 964 and quote their membership number to qualify for the discount.
Posted in News
Comments Off on Angling Trust issues ice advice for clubs and Fisheries
Noughties were nice years for rivers
Noughties were nice years for rivers
The last decade has been the best for rivers since the industrial revolution, the Environment Agency said today.
The Environment Agency highlighted dramatic environmental and water quality improvements and the resulting recovery in species of wildlife to back its claim. These include:
-
Serious water pollution incidents more than halved since 2001
-
Starting a major programme to restore flows and protect rivers and wetlands from the impact of excessive abstraction of water
-
The return of the water vole after a dramatic decline in the 1990s
-
Otters returning to every region in England and Wales
-
Record numbers of salmon and sea trout in the Mersey, Tyne and Thames
-
River Thames winning world’s biggest environmental prize
-
Water quality has improved year on year for the last 20 years